From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Murray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 10, 1999
258 A.D.2d 936 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

February 10, 1999

Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Egan, J. — Criminally Negligent Homicide.

Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Wisner, Pigott, Jr., and Balio, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that County Court committed reversible error by failing to respond adequately to the jury's request to read back certain testimony. We disagree. The record establishes that the court meaningfully responded to the jury's request by directing that all of the witness's relevant direct and cross-examination testimony be read to the jury ( see, People v. Sheriff, 234 A.D.2d 894, 895, lv denied 90 N.Y.2d 910). The court did not err in refusing to direct the reading of testimony beyond that requested ( see, People v. Almodovar, 62 N.Y.2d 126, 132; People v. Sheriff, supra, at 895).


Summaries of

People v. Murray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 10, 1999
258 A.D.2d 936 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Murray

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHRISTINE MURRAY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 10, 1999

Citations

258 A.D.2d 936 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
685 N.Y.S.2d 876

Citing Cases

People v. Wilson

requested the victim's testimony concerning her last sexual encounter with defendant. It is well settled…

People v. Wilson

The jury's note requested the victim's testimony concerning her last sexual encounter with defendant. It is…