From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Murphy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 17, 2006
33 A.D.3d 778 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

No. 2005-01832.

October 17, 2006.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Rockland County (Resnik, J.), entered January 24, 2005, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Before: Adams, J.P., Goldstein, Mastro and Lifson, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant's history of drug and alcohol abuse and other factors that were not contested by him, which resulted in 110 points on the risk assessment form, was a sufficient basis to designate him a level three sex offender ( see People v Abdullah, 31 AD3d 515).

His contention that he was improperly assessed additional points based upon uncertified copies of certain depositions need not be addressed since there was a sufficient basis to designate him a level three sex offender without those depositions ( see People v Lombard, 30 AD3d 573).


Summaries of

People v. Murphy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 17, 2006
33 A.D.3d 778 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

People v. Murphy

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. HARRY MURPHY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 17, 2006

Citations

33 A.D.3d 778 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 7461
822 N.Y.S.2d 637

Citing Cases

People v. Johnson

DECISION & ORDERORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.The defendant's contention…

People v. Johnson

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The defendant's contention that the…