From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Murphy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 12, 1999
260 A.D.2d 505 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

April 12, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Starkey, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is reversed, and a new trial is ordered, to be preceded by an independent source hearing.

We agree with the defendant that, due to disparities between the defendant and the lineup fillers, the lineup procedure was unduly suggestive ( see, People v. Owens, 74 N.Y.2d 677). Thus, because no basis was developed at the Wade hearing for an independent source for the victims' in-court identifications of the defendant, a new trial is required, to be preceded by an independent source hearing ( see, People v. Burts, 78 N.Y.2d 20).

O'Brien, J. P., Ritter, Thompson and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Murphy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 12, 1999
260 A.D.2d 505 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Murphy

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JEROME MURPHY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 12, 1999

Citations

260 A.D.2d 505 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
686 N.Y.S.2d 332

Citing Cases

People v. Smart

the Wade hearing (United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218, 87 S.Ct. 1926, 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 ), the apparent…

People v. Smart

Although defense counsel may have failed specifically to point out, during the Wade hearing (United States v…