From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Mosher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 22, 1995
222 A.D.2d 1034 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

December 22, 1995

Appeal from the Cayuga County Court, Corning, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Lawton, Fallon, Doerr and Balio, JJ.


Judgment unanimously reversed on the law, plea vacated and matter remitted to Cayuga County Court for further proceedings on the indictment. Memorandum: In the usual case, a defendant cannot obtain appellate review of the alleged insufficiency of a plea allocution unless defendant has moved to vacate the plea or moved to vacate the judgment pursuant to CPL 440.10 (People v Johnson, 82 N.Y.2d 683, 684). Where defendant's utterances at the time of the plea cast significant doubt upon the voluntariness of the plea, however, the court must conduct further inquiry to ensure that defendant's plea is knowing, intelligent and voluntary (People v Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 666; People v Francis, 38 N.Y.2d 150, 153). When the court fails in that duty and accepts the plea without further inquiry, defendant may challenge the sufficiency of the allocution on direct appeal, despite the absence of a formal postallocution motion (People v Toxey, 86 N.Y.2d 725, 726; People v Lopez, supra, at 666; People v Simone, 179 A.D.2d 694, 695; People v Sobczak, 105 A.D.2d 1053, 1053-1054).

Defendant's colloquy clearly raised a possible agency defense to the charge of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree. County Court should have conducted further inquiry on the record to ensure that defendant was aware of the defense and was knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently agreeing to waive it (see, People v Simone, supra; People v Sobczak, supra). The court conducted no further inquiry on the record, but rather, went off the record. After a pause in the proceedings, the court accepted defendant's plea of guilty without further comment. That was error. A silent record is not sufficient to assure this Court that defendant's plea was voluntary (see, People v Bouges, 129 A.D.2d 967, 968), nor did the remarks of counsel at sentencing concerning the waiver of the agency defense cure the court's failure to conduct further inquiry on the record prior to accepting defendant's plea of guilty.


Summaries of

People v. Mosher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 22, 1995
222 A.D.2d 1034 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Mosher

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MATTHEW E. MOSHER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 22, 1995

Citations

222 A.D.2d 1034 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
636 N.Y.S.2d 246

Citing Cases

People v. Waterman

Defendant also contends that his plea must be vacated because County Court failed in its duty to make further…

People v. McCawley

Defendant contends that County Court erred in accepting his guilty plea without conducting further inquiry to…