From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Morris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 14, 1962
17 A.D.2d 767 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)

Opinion

September 14, 1962

Appeal from the Erie County Court.

Present — Williams, P.J., Bastow, Goldman, McClusky and Henry, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed and matter remitted to the Erie County Court for a hearing on the allegations of the petition concerning alleged irregularities in the submission of the case to the jury. Memorandum: We treat this as a proceeding in coram nobis although it is labeled as a motion under subdivision 7 of section 465 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Trial Judge correctly decided that an application under that section must be made within one year and that this application for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence was not timely. However, the allegations of irregularities during the trial and after the charge may not be overlooked. The defendant is entitled to a hearing as to those allegations. The hearing should be held before a Judge other than the Judge who tried the case inasmuch as the Trial Judge may be called as a witness.


Summaries of

People v. Morris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 14, 1962
17 A.D.2d 767 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)
Case details for

People v. Morris

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSEPH MORRIS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 14, 1962

Citations

17 A.D.2d 767 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)

Citing Cases

People v. Huggins

10 (1) (g), a motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence had to be made within one…

People v. Becvar

It is required, then, that the application be made to the court which rendered the original judgment. (…