From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Morgan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 2, 1998
251 A.D.2d 14 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

June 2, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (George Covington, J.).


Defendant's claim that he was deprived of a fair trial because the trial court advised the jury that it had closed the courtroom because of other ongoing investigations by the undercover officer is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that while the better practice would have been to avoid drawing the jury's attention to such closure unless specifically requested by defendant (see, 1 CJI[NY] 4.23, at 171; see also, People v. Rosario, 244 A.D.2d 579), defendant was not prejudiced under the circumstances and any error was harmless in view of the overwhelming evidence of defendant's guilt.

We find the sentences imposed to be excessive to the extent indicated.

We have considered defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Tom, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Morgan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 2, 1998
251 A.D.2d 14 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Morgan

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ERROL MORGAN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 2, 1998

Citations

251 A.D.2d 14 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
672 N.Y.S.2d 717