From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Morbillo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 18, 2008
56 A.D.3d 694 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2007-06467.

November 18, 2008.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Hinrichs, J), rendered June 20, 2007, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Robert C. Mitchell, Riverhead, N.Y. (Alfred J. Cicale of counsel), for appellant.

Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Michael J. Brennan of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Rivera, J.P., Florio, Angiolillo, McCarthy and Chambers, JJ.


Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, the plea is vacated, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings in accordance herewith.

During the plea proceedings, the County Court failed to advise the defendant that his sentence would run consecutively to the undischarged sentence on his prior conviction. At sentencing, over the defendant's objection, the County Court imposed a consecutive sentence pursuant to Penal Law § 70.25 (2-a).

When a court fails to advise the defendant of the direct consequences of the plea, the plea cannot be deemed knowing, voluntary, and intelligent, and the defendant must be given the opportunity to withdraw the plea ( see People v Hill, 9 NY3d 189, 191, cert denied 553 US ___, 128 S Ct 2430; People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9, 17). Since the consecutive sentence was a direct consequence of the plea ( see People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 403; see also Penal Law § 70.25 [2-a]; Matter of Rivera v Goord, 24 AD3d 679, 680), the court's failure to advise the defendant at the time of the plea that his sentence would run consecutively to the undischarged sentence on his prior conviction prevented his plea from being knowing, voluntary, and intelligent ( see People v Hill, 9 NY3d at 191; People v Louree, 8 NY3d 541, 545; People v Catu, 4 NY3d 242, 245). Accordingly, we reverse the judgment, vacate the plea, and remit the matter to the County Court, Suffolk County, for a new plea proceeding in which it shall advise the defendant that, should he elect to plead guilty, his sentence would run consecutively to the undischarged sentence on his prior conviction, and for further proceedings on the indictment thereafter.


Summaries of

People v. Morbillo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 18, 2008
56 A.D.3d 694 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

People v. Morbillo

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MICHAEL MORBILLO, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 18, 2008

Citations

56 A.D.3d 694 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 9102
871 N.Y.S.2d 151

Citing Cases

People v. Potter

Even assuming arguendo Defendant's claim is not procedurally barred, nevertheless, he is not entitled to an…

People v. Newbould

By failing to move to withdraw the plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant failed to preserve…