From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Morales

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Feb 19, 2020
180 A.D.3d 934 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

2018–06944 Ind. No. 339/16

02-19-2020

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Oscar MORALES, appellant.

Thomas J. Butler, New York, NY, for appellant. Madeline Singas, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Jared Chester of counsel; Matthew C. Frankel on the brief), for respondent.


Thomas J. Butler, New York, NY, for appellant.

Madeline Singas, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Jared Chester of counsel; Matthew C. Frankel on the brief), for respondent.

REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., JOSEPH J. MALTESE, BETSY BARROS, VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Terence P. Murphy, J.), rendered November 8, 2017, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that he violated conditions thereof, upon his admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous convictions of operating a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol as a felony, aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree, and operating a motor vehicle without an ignition interlock device. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

ORDERED that the motion of Thomas J. Butler for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant is granted, and he is directed to turn over all papers in his possession to the appellant's new counsel assigned herein; and it is further,

ORDERED that Thomas A. Kenniff, 87 Walker Street, 2nd Floor, New York, NY, 10013, is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal; and it is further,

ORDERED that the respondent is directed to furnish a copy of the certified transcript of the proceedings to the appellant's new assigned counsel; and it is further,

ORDERED that new counsel shall serve and file a brief on behalf of the appellant within 90 days of the date of this decision and order on motion, and the respondent shall serve and file its brief within 30 days after the brief on behalf of the appellant is served and filed. By prior decision and order on motion of this Court dated August 9, 2018, the appellant was granted leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, with the appeal to be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings) and on the briefs of the parties. The parties are directed to file one original and five duplicate hard copies, and one digital copy, of their respective briefs, and to serve one hard copy on each other (see 22 NYCRR 1250.9 [a][4]; [c][1] ).

The brief submitted by the appellant's counsel pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 is deficient because it fails to contain an adequate statement of facts and fails to analyze potential appellate issues or highlight facts in the record that might arguably support the appeal (see People v. Ellis, 156 A.D.3d 718, 720, 67 N.Y.S.3d 641 ; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 A.D.3d 252, 256, 931 N.Y.S.2d 676 ). The statement of facts does not review, in any detail, the Supreme Court's advisements to the appellant regarding the rights he was waiving, the inquiries made of the appellant to ensure that the admission was knowingly and voluntarily entered, or the appellant's responses to any of those advisements and inquiries (see People v. Velez, 176 A.D.3d 1239, 1240, 109 N.Y.S.3d 666 ; People v. Ellis, 156 A.D.3d at 719, 67 N.Y.S.3d 641 ; People v. Deprosperis, 126 A.D.3d 997, 998, 7 N.Y.S.3d 194 ). Since the brief does not demonstrate that assigned counsel fulfilled his obligations under Anders v. California, we must assign new counsel to represent the appellant (see People v. Velez, 176 A.D.3d at 1240, 109 N.Y.S.3d 666 ; People v. Ellis, 156 A.D.3d at 720, 67 N.Y.S.3d 641 ; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 A.D.3d at 258, 931 N.Y.S.2d 676 ).

RIVERA, J.P., MALTESE, BARROS, BRATHWAITE NELSON and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Morales

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Feb 19, 2020
180 A.D.3d 934 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

People v. Morales

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Oscar Morales…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Feb 19, 2020

Citations

180 A.D.3d 934 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
116 N.Y.S.3d 573
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 1188

Citing Cases

People v. London

The parties are directed to upload, through the digital portal on this Court's website, digital copies of…

People v. London

The parties are directed to upload, through the digital portal on this Court's website, digital copies of…