From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Moore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 20, 1988
141 A.D.2d 769 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

June 20, 1988

Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Harris, J.).


Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

We find no merit to the defendant's contention that the sentence imposed constitutes cruel and unusual punishment in violation of constitutional proscriptions (NY Const, art I, § 5; US Const 8th Amend; People v Broadie, 37 N.Y.2d 100, cert denied 423 U.S. 950; People v Albano, 124 A.D.2d 739, 740, lv denied 69 N.Y.2d 824). Furthermore, as the sentence imposed was the result of a negotiated plea, the defendant may not now be heard to complain that it was excessive (see, People v Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816). Thompson, J.P., Bracken, Brown, Weinstein and Spatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Moore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 20, 1988
141 A.D.2d 769 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

People v. Moore

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DAVID MOORE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 20, 1988

Citations

141 A.D.2d 769 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

People v. Soto-Rodriguez

Contrary to defendant's contention, the mandatory prison sentence he received of 15 years to life upon his…

People v. Flowers

We further find that, under the circumstances, the sentence imposed under indictment No. 7605/86 was not…