From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Montemaro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 31, 2003
2 A.D.3d 1423 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

KA 02-00427.

December 31, 2003.

Appeal from a judgment of Ontario County Court (Doran, J.), entered February 20, 2002, convicting defendant after a jury trial of, inter alia, assault in the third degree (two counts).

DAVID M. PARKS, ITHACA, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

R. MICHAEL TANTILLO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, CANANDAIGUA (THOMAS D. REH OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Before: PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., GREEN, PINE, HURLBUTT, AND KEHOE, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel because defense counsel prevented defendant from exercising his right to testify at trial. That contention, however, rests primarily on matters outside the record and thus is not properly raised on direct appeal ( see People v. Bennett, 284 A.D.2d 338, lv denied 96 N.Y.2d 898; People v. Martin, 271 A.D.2d 459, lv denied 95 N.Y.2d 868).


Summaries of

People v. Montemaro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 31, 2003
2 A.D.3d 1423 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Montemaro

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JOSHUA A…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 31, 2003

Citations

2 A.D.3d 1423 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
768 N.Y.S.2d 899