From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Monroe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 7, 1994
206 A.D.2d 563 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

July 7, 1994

Appeal from the County Court of Ulster County (Vogt, J.).


We are unconvinced by defendant's claim that the failure of defense counsel to make a pretrial motion to suppress identification testimony constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel under the particular circumstances of this case. The People's proof in this case was very strong and, in light of defendant's lengthy criminal history, defense counsel negotiated an advantageous plea bargain. As for defendant's assertion that his sentence of 4 to 8 years in prison is unduly harsh or excessive, we note that defendant did not receive the harshest sentence available for a second felony offender. Under the circumstances, we find no basis to disturb County Court's disposition.

Cardona, P.J., White, Weiss, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Monroe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 7, 1994
206 A.D.2d 563 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Monroe

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FREDERICK MONROE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 7, 1994

Citations

206 A.D.2d 563 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
615 N.Y.S.2d 1010

Citing Cases

People v. Longshore

Defendant appeals. Initially, we reject defendant's claim that he was denied the effective assistance of…