Opinion
February 16, 1993
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Savarese, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The failure of the prosecution to turn over a copy of the receipt the complainant signed before retrieving her property from the property clerk's office was not a Rosario violation (see, People v Rosario, 9 N.Y.2d 286, cert denied 368 U.S. 866) since the information contained in the form was unrelated to the subject matter of the complainant's direct testimony (see, CPL 240.45 [a]; People v Deas, 174 A.D.2d 751; People v Watkins, 157 A.D.2d 301).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Thompson, J.P., Rosenblatt, Lawrence and Miller, JJ., concur.