From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Mitchelle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 17, 1998
253 A.D.2d 677 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Summary

affirming conviction where defendant was seen bending over location on the pavement from which a gun was later recovered, police found a shell of matching caliber in police vehicle where defendant had been seated, and two complainants identified defendant as the man with the gun

Summary of this case from Black v. McGinnis

Opinion

September 17, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.).


Defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel was never raised in a CPL 440.10 motion, where crucial background facts might have been developed on proper inquiry, and therefore this Court cannot evaluate the issue without resort to "supposition and conjecture" ( People v. Rivera, 71 N.Y.2d 705, 709). On the instant record, we conclude that defendant received effective assistance, and that counsel's failure to seek pre-trial suppression of the weapon, recovered from the pavement, may be explained by the difficulties inherent in establishing standing, given defendant's position that he was never in possession of the weapon ( see, People v. Cruz, 165 A.D.2d 205, 208-209, lv denied 77 N.Y.2d 959). Defendant has thus waived any claim that the gun should be suppressed, and we would in any event find such argument without merit. The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence ( see, People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490). There was ample evidence of guilt, including evidence that defendant was seen bending down to a spot on the pavement and standing again, moments before the gun was found on that spot, and evidence that a bullet shell of matching caliber was later found on defendant's seat in a police vehicle, as well as positive identification by both complainants of defendant as having brandished the gun. Defendant's acquittal of certain counts does not undermine the sufficiency and weight of the evidence supporting the count upon which he was convicted ( see, People v. Rivera, 201 A.D.2d 377, lv denied 83 N.Y.2d 875).

Concur — Tom, J. P. Mazzarelli, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Mitchelle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 17, 1998
253 A.D.2d 677 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

affirming conviction where defendant was seen bending over location on the pavement from which a gun was later recovered, police found a shell of matching caliber in police vehicle where defendant had been seated, and two complainants identified defendant as the man with the gun

Summary of this case from Black v. McGinnis
Case details for

People v. Mitchelle

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DARRELL MITCHELLE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 17, 1998

Citations

253 A.D.2d 677 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
680 N.Y.S.2d 474

Citing Cases

People v. Pena

Defendant contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel principally because his attorney failed…

Black v. McGinnis

In short, the evidence that Black possessed the handgun was overwhelming even though the gun was not…