From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Mitchell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 24, 1992
181 A.D.2d 583 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

March 24, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County, Richard Andrias, J.


Although the information supplied to the police was based on hearsay, probable cause existed to arrest defendant for criminal possession of a weapon, it appearing that the informant had some basis of knowledge for the information imparted and that the information was reliable (People v Johnson, 66 N.Y.2d 398, 402). The citizen informant provided detailed information that an armed antagonist would be returning once more to "get" the informant's brother, and he agreed to and did successfully carry out a plan to identify the antagonist for the police officers. As an identified private citizen coming forward to report criminal activity, the informant was presumptively reliable (see, People v Cantre, 95 A.D.2d 522, 526, affd 65 N.Y.2d 790). The basis of his knowledge was clear, as he was relaying an imminent threat conveyed to him by the antagonist's friend. The informant's reliability was enhanced by the fact that had his story not been true, he would have been exposing himself to the risk of prosecution for providing false information to the police. Accordingly, the suppression court properly concluded that probable cause existed to arrest defendant.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Wallach, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Mitchell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 24, 1992
181 A.D.2d 583 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Mitchell

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BERNARD MITCHELL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 24, 1992

Citations

181 A.D.2d 583 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
581 N.Y.S.2d 321

Citing Cases

People v. Kitchen

We disagree. The seizure of the cocaine from the attic of the home where defendant was initially arrested was…