Opinion
October 23, 1989
Appeal from the County Court, Westchester County (Lange, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Upon our review of the record we find that defendant was not denied his statutory right to a speedy trial. After subtracting the periods of delay directly resulting from the defendant's unavailability due to his detention in Connecticut (CPL 30.30 [e]); the delay directly resulting from the defendant's pretrial motions (CPL 30.30 [a]; People v Worley, 66 N.Y.2d 523, 527; People v Brown, 113 A.D.2d 812); the delays from adjournments at the defendant's request (CPL 30.30 [b]; People v Brown, supra); and the delays to which the defendant consented by failing to object (CPL 30.30 [b]; People v Pappas, 128 A.D.2d 556; People v Seabrook, 126 A.D.2d 583; People v Gaggi, 104 A.D.2d 422, appeal dismissed 65 N.Y.2d 636); the total time chargeable to the People is within the permitted six calendar months (see, e.g., People v Jones, 105 A.D.2d 179, 188, affd 66 N.Y.2d 529, 540). Accordingly, the defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment pursuant to CPL 30.30 was properly denied.
We have examined the defendant's remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Mangano, J.P., Thompson, Eiber and Balletta, JJ., concur.