From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Mirabel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Oct 13, 2020
187 A.D.3d 514 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

12042 Ind. No. 2746/15 Case No. 2019-3589

10-13-2020

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Eddi H. MIRABEL, Defendant–Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Nicole P. Geoglis of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. District Attorney, New York (Katherine Kulkarni of counsel), for respondent.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Nicole P. Geoglis of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. District Attorney, New York (Katherine Kulkarni of counsel), for respondent.

Gische, J.P., Singh, Kennedy, Mendez, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Abraham L. Clott, J.), entered on or about December 12, 2018, which adjudicated defendant a level two sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6–C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court providently exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure (see People v. Gillotti, 23 N.Y.3d 841, 994 N.Y.S.2d 1, 18 N.E.3d 701 [2014] ). Given the particular egregiousness of the underlying crime, we do not find that there was any overassessment of points, and the record does not establish any basis for a downward departure. Among other factors, the severity of the young victim's injuries suggests an indifference on the part of defendant to the well-being of others, and a consequent risk of sexual reoffense.


Summaries of

People v. Mirabel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Oct 13, 2020
187 A.D.3d 514 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

People v. Mirabel

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Eddi H. Mirabel…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 13, 2020

Citations

187 A.D.3d 514 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 5691
130 N.Y.S.3d 315

Citing Cases

People v. Romulus

Second, a court must determine whether a defendant has proven the existence of these circumstances by a…