From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Minch

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Jun 1, 2012
491 Mich. 931 (Mich. 2012)

Opinion

Docket No. 144631. COA No. 301316.

2012-06-1

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Kurtis Ray MINCH, Defendant–Appellee.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 20, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.302(H)(1). We further order the Muskegon Circuit Court, in accordance with Administrative Order 2003–03, to determine whether the defendant is indigent and, if so, to appoint Kevin J. Wistrom, if feasible, to represent the defendant in this Court. If this appointment is not feasible, the trial court shall, within the same time frame, appoint other counsel to represent the defendant in this Court. The parties shall submit supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of the order appointing counsel, or a ruling that the defendant is not entitled to appointed counsel.


Summaries of

People v. Minch

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Jun 1, 2012
491 Mich. 931 (Mich. 2012)
Case details for

People v. Minch

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Kurtis Ray MINCH…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Jun 1, 2012

Citations

491 Mich. 931 (Mich. 2012)
813 N.W.2d 750

Citing Cases

People v. Minch

People v. Minch, 295 Mich.App. 92, 95, 811 N.W.2d 571 (2011). See People v. Minch, 491 Mich. 931, 813 N.W.2d…