Opinion
October 26, 1987
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Linakis, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The testimony of the complainant, who had ample opportunity to view the defendant during the commission of the crime, was, in and of itself, sufficient to support the defendant's conviction (see, People v. McCrimmon, 131 A.D.2d 598). The trier of fact was entitled to give great weight to the complainant's testimony and to reject that of the defendant and his alibi witnesses (see, People v. McCrimmon, supra).
We have considered the defendant's other contentions, including those in his pro se brief, and find them to be without merit. Mangano, J.P., Bracken, Kunzeman and Harwood, JJ., concur.