From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Miller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 17, 1992
188 A.D.2d 399 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

December 17, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Jay Gold, J.).


In this appeal, the People seek to challenge the trial court's grant of defendant's motion, pursuant to CPL 210.20 (1) (b), to inspect the Grand Jury minutes and dismiss the indictment on grounds of legal insufficiency. Defendant was not served with the appellate brief. Trial counsel was served; however, his duty to represent defendant terminated at the conclusion of the proceedings below (see, 22 NYCRR 606.5 [a] [1]). He had not been assigned or retained, and he made no appearance to represent defendant on this appeal. Accordingly, no valid service upon defendant has been effected, and the appeal must be dismissed.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Ellerin, Kupferman, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Miller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 17, 1992
188 A.D.2d 399 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. HOLLAND MILLER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 17, 1992

Citations

188 A.D.2d 399 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
591 N.Y.S.2d 395

Citing Cases

People v. Pena

The appeal must be dismissed because the defendant was not served with the People's brief. The People's…

People v. Hernandez

Indeed, counsel has engaged in motion practice on the defendant's behalf in this court and has submitted a…