From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Millard

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Feb 9, 2017
147 A.D.3d 1155 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

02-09-2017

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Edward A. MILLARD, Appellant.

Sandra M. Colatosti, Albany, for appellant. Stephen K. Cornwell Jr., District Attorney, Binghamton (Stephen Ferri of counsel), for respondent.


Sandra M. Colatosti, Albany, for appellant.

Stephen K. Cornwell Jr., District Attorney, Binghamton (Stephen Ferri of counsel), for respondent.

Before: PETERS, P.J., EGAN JR., ROSE, DEVINE and AARONS, JJ.

PETERS, P.J.Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Cawley, J.), rendered January 10, 2012, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sexual act in the second degree.

Defendant waived indictment and pleaded guilty to a superior court information charging him with criminal sexual act in the second degree. He was sentenced in accordance with the plea agreement to six months in jail and 10 years of probation. Defendant appeals.We affirm. Defendant's sole contention on appeal is that his plea was not knowing, voluntary and intelligent because County Court did not inquire whether he was under the influence of drugs or alcohol during the plea colloquy. The record does not reflect that defendant made any postallocution motion so as to preserve the issue for our review and, given that defendant made no statements during the plea colloquy that were inconsistent with his guilt or the voluntariness of his plea, the narrow exception to the preservation requirement is inapplicable (see People v. DeAngelo, 136 A.D.3d 1119, 1120, 25 N.Y.S.3d 405 [2016] ; People v. Buie, 128 A.D.3d 1281, 1281, 10 N.Y.S.3d 351 [2015] ). In any event, nothing in the record suggests that defendant was under the influence of drugs or alcohol during the plea colloquy (see People v. Buie, 128 A.D.3d at 1281, 10 N.Y.S.3d 351 ).

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

EGAN JR., ROSE, DEVINE and AARONS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Millard

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Feb 9, 2017
147 A.D.3d 1155 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Millard

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Edward A. MILLARD…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 9, 2017

Citations

147 A.D.3d 1155 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 1030
46 N.Y.S.3d 441

Citing Cases

People v. Joubert

Defendant's sole contention on appeal is that his guilty plea was not knowing, intelligent and voluntary…

People v. Joubert

Defendant's sole contention on appeal is that his guilty plea was not knowing, intelligent and voluntary…