From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Millard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 3, 1997
241 A.D.2d 567 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

July 3, 1997

Appeal from the County Court of Rensselaer County (McGrath, J.).


After pleading guilty to attempted robbery in the first degree and robbery in the third degree, defendant was sentenced as a second felony offender to concurrent prison terms of 6 1/2 to 13 years and 2 to 4 years, respectively. Given defendant's criminal history and the fact that the sentence was in accordance with the plea agreement, we reject defendant's contention that the sentence imposed for attempted robbery in the first degree was harsh and excessive (see, People v. Buchicchio, 116 A.D.2d 729, lv denied 67 N.Y.2d 940).

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, White, Casey and Spain, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Millard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 3, 1997
241 A.D.2d 567 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Millard

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EDWARD MILLARD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 3, 1997

Citations

241 A.D.2d 567 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
659 N.Y.S.2d 558

Citing Cases

People v. Mitchell

In addition, we do not find that the sentence imposed upon defendant was either harsh or excessive. The…

People v. Kenyon

Defendant contends that his sentence is harsh and excessive in that this is his first conviction of a violent…