Summary
noting that intent can be inferred from a defendant's actions and the surrounding circumstances
Summary of this case from Kimbrough v. BradtOpinion
February 5, 1990
Appeal from the County Court, Westchester County (West, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that his guilt of attempted assault in the first degree was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt is without merit. Viewing the evidence adduced at trial in a light most favorable to the People (People v Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it is legally sufficient to support the defendant's guilt. With respect to the charge of attempted assault in the first degree, the People proved that the defendant pointed an automatic pistol at a police officer, and that 2 shots, only 1 of which was fired by the officer, were discharged during the confrontation. Since intent can be inferred from the defendant's conduct and the surrounding circumstances (People v Bracey, 41 N.Y.2d 296, 301) it can be concluded that the defendant engaged in conduct calculated to result in serious injury to the police officer. Furthermore, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15).
Additionally, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).
We have examined the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be either unpreserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05) or without merit. Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.