From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Mickens

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 27, 1999
267 A.D.2d 479 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Submitted December 1, 1999

December 27, 1999

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Cacciabaudo, J.), rendered March 23, 1999, convicting him of arson in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

James M. Montgomery, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

James M. Catterson, Jr., District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Susan I. Braitman of counsel), for respondent.

LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, J.P., FRED T. SANTUCCI, MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, HOWARD MILLER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

At the plea proceeding, the Supreme Court told the defendant that if he got into "any trouble" before the sentencing he would not receive the promised sentence. The defendant was subsequently arrested, and at the sentencing, the Supreme Court denied his application to withdraw his plea or for a hearing to determine the "facts and circumstances" of the post-plea arrest. Contrary to the defendant's contention, since he neither raised any issue concerning the validity of the charge upon which the post-plea arrest was based, nor denied any involvement in the underlying crime, the Supreme Court did not err in denying his application (see, People v. Wilson, 257 A.D.2d 674 ; People v. Maupin, 198 A.D.2d 236 ).

BRACKEN, J.P., SANTUCCI, ALTMAN, FRIEDMANN, and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Mickens

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 27, 1999
267 A.D.2d 479 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Mickens

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. JOSEPH D. MICKENS, appellant. (Ind. No…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 27, 1999

Citations

267 A.D.2d 479 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
701 N.Y.S.2d 441

Citing Cases

People v. Jackson

The defendant admitted that he had contact with his wife and the County Court imposed an enhanced sentence.…