Opinion
November 14, 1994
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (DeLury, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The People turned over to the defendant the "Aided" card containing the complainant's statement to the police well in advance of the complainant's testimony. Thus, there is no merit to the defendant's claim of a Rosario violation (see, People v Rosario, 9 N.Y.2d 286, cert denied 368 U.S. 866; see also, People v. Perez, 65 N.Y.2d 154, 158; People v. Fulgham, 155 A.D.2d 687).
We have considered the defendant's remaining contentions and find that they are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Ritter, J.P., Copertino, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.