From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Merriman

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 25, 2023
212 A.D.3d 845 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)

Opinion

2019–00949 Ind. No. 1768/16

01-25-2023

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Gerry MERRIMAN, appellant.

Konta Georges & Bruza, P.C., New York, NY (Robert W. Georges of counsel), for appellant. Anne T. Donnelly, District Attorney, Mineola, NY (Tammy J. Smiley and Jason R. Richards of counsel), for respondent.


Konta Georges & Bruza, P.C., New York, NY (Robert W. Georges of counsel), for appellant.

Anne T. Donnelly, District Attorney, Mineola, NY (Tammy J. Smiley and Jason R. Richards of counsel), for respondent.

FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P., ROBERT J. MILLER, PAUL WOOTEN, LILLIAN WAN, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Robert A. McDonald, J.), rendered December 14, 2018, convicting him of course of sexual conduct against a child in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court properly precluded defense counsel from questioning the complainant about a prior allegation of sexual misconduct made by the complainant. The defendant failed to make a showing that the prior allegation bore a significant probative relation to the crimes charged against him (see CPL 60.42[5] ; People v. Mandel, 48 N.Y.2d 952, 953, 425 N.Y.S.2d 63, 401 N.E.2d 185 ; People v. Piedra, 87 A.D.3d 706, 706, 928 N.Y.S.2d 752 ). The court also did not otherwise err in limiting the scope of cross-examination (see People v. Corby, 6 N.Y.3d 231, 234, 811 N.Y.S.2d 613, 844 N.E.2d 1135 ).

The defendant contends that the prosecutor engaged in misconduct by proffering false testimony (see People v. Colon, 13 N.Y.3d 343, 349, 890 N.Y.S.2d 424, 918 N.E.2d 936 ). However, the record does not demonstrate that the People proffered false testimony.

The defendant's contention that certain records should have been admitted into evidence at trial is without merit. The defendant's remaining contentions are improperly raised for the first time in his reply brief (see People v. Baker, 205 A.D.3d 815, 818, 167 N.Y.S.3d 550 ; People v. Baggett, 202 A.D.3d 812, 813, 158 N.Y.S.3d 846 ).

CONNOLLY, J.P., MILLER, WOOTEN and WAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Merriman

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 25, 2023
212 A.D.3d 845 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
Case details for

People v. Merriman

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Gerry MERRIMAN, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 25, 2023

Citations

212 A.D.3d 845 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
212 A.D.3d 845

Citing Cases

People v. Brown

The defendant's contention that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel is based, in part, on…