From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Mejia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 19, 2004
6 A.D.3d 630 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2001-05958.

Decided April 19, 2004.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Rockland County (Resnik, J.), imposed May 23, 2001, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

James D. Licata, New City, N.Y. (Lois Cappelletti of counsel), for appellant.

Michael E. Bongiorno, District Attorney, New City, N.Y. (Ann C. Sullivan of counsel), for respondent.

Before: A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J., ANITA R. FLORIO, HOWARD MILLER, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

Since the defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentence which was thereafter actually imposed, he has no basis to now complain that his sentence was excessive ( see People v. Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816).

PRUDENTI, P.J., FLORIO, H. MILLER, SCHMIDT and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Mejia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 19, 2004
6 A.D.3d 630 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Mejia

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. ALEX MEJIA, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 19, 2004

Citations

6 A.D.3d 630 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
774 N.Y.S.2d 801

Citing Cases

People v. Vere

Here, although the County Court did not warn the defendant during the plea allocution that he would be…

People v. Wagstaff

The defendant's contention that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel is not properly before…