From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Medina

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 19, 2001
281 A.D.2d 563 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Argued February 22, 2001.

March 19, 2001.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J.), rendered February 4, 1999, convicting her of attempted murder in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

M. Sue Wycoff, New York, N.Y. (Natalie Rea of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Nicoletta J. Caferri, and Lynne Kurtz-Citrin of counsel), for respondent.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., LEO F. McGINITY, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, HOWARD MILLER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court properly ruled, after a Sandoval hearing (see, People v. Sandoval, 34 N.Y.2d 371), that if the defendant took the stand, the prosecutor could question her about her four petit larceny convictions and their underlying facts (see, People v. Walker, 83 N.Y.2d 455; People v. Branch, 155 A.D.2d 475; People v. Myrick, 128 A.D.2d 732), her use of aliases (see, People v. Walker, supra), and her status as an illegal alien (see, People v. Caicedo, 173 A.D.2d 630; People v. Ortero, 75 A.D.2d 168).

The defendant's sentence was neither harsh nor excessive (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Medina

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 19, 2001
281 A.D.2d 563 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Medina

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. TERESA MEDINA, A/K/A MARIA GONZALEZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 19, 2001

Citations

281 A.D.2d 563 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
721 N.Y.S.2d 829

Citing Cases

People v. Shi

ple v. Mandigo, 176 A.D.2d 386, 387, 574 N.Y.S.2d 92 [1991] ), testified without the benefit of a Sandoval…

People v. Ortiz

The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that the Supreme Court's Sandoval…