From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. McNeil-Smith

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Jan 22, 2020
179 A.D.3d 950 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

2018-06682 Ind. No. 10190/15

01-22-2020

The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Irving MCNEIL–SMITH, Appellant.

Paul Skip Laisure, New York, N.Y. (David L. Goodwin of counsel), for appellant. Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Rhea A. Grob of counsel; Alex Randazzo on the brief), for respondent.


Paul Skip Laisure, New York, N.Y. (David L. Goodwin of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Rhea A. Grob of counsel; Alex Randazzo on the brief), for respondent.

MARK C. DILLON, J.P., RUTH C. BALKIN, FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (James P. Sullivan, J.), rendered July 5, 2017, convicting him of attempted assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 2 to 4 years on the conviction of attempted assault in the second degree, and an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 3½ to 7 years on the conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, with the sentences to run consecutively to each other.

ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law, by providing that the sentences imposed shall run concurrently with each other; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

The People concede that the Supreme Court should not have imposed consecutive sentences on the convictions of attempted assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, as the facts adduced at the plea allocution did not establish that the defendant's acts underlying the crimes were separate and distinct (see Penal Law § 70.25[2] ; People v. Hamilton , 4 N.Y.3d 654, 659, 797 N.Y.S.2d 408, 830 N.E.2d 306 ; People v. Leftenant , 173 A.D.3d 1211, 1212–1213, 104 N.Y.S.3d 162 ; People v. Garcia , 287 A.D.2d 466, 467, 730 N.Y.S.2d 884 ). Accordingly, we modify the judgment by providing that those sentences shall run concurrently with each other.

DILLON, J.P., BALKIN, CONNOLLY and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. McNeil-Smith

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Jan 22, 2020
179 A.D.3d 950 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

People v. McNeil-Smith

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Irving McNeil-Smith…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Jan 22, 2020

Citations

179 A.D.3d 950 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 434
114 N.Y.S.3d 242