From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. McMahon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 2, 1998
247 A.D.2d 409 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

February 2, 1998

Appeal from the County Court, Orange County (Berry, J.).


Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The defendant failed to establish a reasonable expectation of privacy in the property that was the subject of the search. Therefore, he is without standing to contest the validity of that search and the resulting seizure of physical evidence found inside the subject premises ( see, People v. Ponder, 54 N.Y.2d 160; People v. Crisano, 247 A.D.2d 403 [decided herewith]).

In view of the foregoing, we have no occasion to consider the defendant's remaining contentions.

Sullivan, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. McMahon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 2, 1998
247 A.D.2d 409 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. McMahon

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GEORGE McMAHON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 2, 1998

Citations

247 A.D.2d 409 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
668 N.Y.S.2d 470