From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. McKiver

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 22, 2009
24 Misc. 3d 78 (N.Y. App. Term 2009)

Opinion

No. 2008-660 RI CR.

June 22, 2009.

APPEAL from a n order of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Richmond County (Matthew Sciarrino, J.), dated March 13, 2008. The order sua sponte dismissed the accusatory instrument on the ground that the People had violated defendant's statutory right to a speedy trial.

Daniel M. Donovan, Jr., District Attorney, Staten Island ( Morrie I. Kleinbart of counsel), for appellant. Legal Aid Society, New York City ( Steven Banks and Steven R. Berko of counsel), for respondent.

PESCE, P.J., GOLIA and STEINHARDT, JJ., concur.


OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

Order reversed, on the law, accusatory instrument reinstated and matter remitted to the Criminal Court for all further proceedings.

Defendant was charged in an accusatory instrument with assault in the third degree (Penal Law § 120.00), endangering the welfare of a child (Penal Law § 260.10), attempted assault in the third degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 120.00) and harassment in the second degree (Penal Law § 240.26). On March 13, 2008 the Criminal Court sua sponte dismissed the accusatory instrument based on speedy trial grounds ( see CPL 30.30 [b]).

A motion to dismiss "must be made in writing and upon reasonable notice to the [P]eople" (CPL 210.45 [emphasis added]). While the People were put on notice that the court was contemplating dismissal of the accusatory instrument based on CPL 30.30 ( see CPL 170.45, 210.45; People v Alston, 191 AD2d 176), they expressly objected to a dismissal based on said ground, asserting that there was no written motion before the court. Therefore, contrary to defendant's contention, the People did not waive the procedural requirement that the motion be made in writing ( cf. People v Jennings, 69 NY2d 103; People v Singleton, 42 NY2d 466; People v Cook, 193 AD2d 366, 369), and the Criminal Court improperly sua sponte dismissed the accusatory instrument. Accordingly, the order is reversed, the accusatory instrument reinstated and the matter remitted to the Criminal Court for all further proceedings.


Summaries of

People v. McKiver

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 22, 2009
24 Misc. 3d 78 (N.Y. App. Term 2009)
Case details for

People v. McKiver

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. MICHELLE McKIVER…

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 22, 2009

Citations

24 Misc. 3d 78 (N.Y. App. Term 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 29273
886 N.Y.S.2d 790

Citing Cases

People v. Sanok

Although defendant's omnibus motion was filed on September 12, 2012, the Justice Court charged the People…

People v. McKiver

September 22, 2009. Appeal from the App Term, 2d Dept: 24 Misc 3d 78 (Richmond). Pigott,…