From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. McKinnon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 31, 1990
168 A.D.2d 691 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

December 31, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Feldman, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's claims regarding the jury charge and the sufficiency of the evidence of "physical injury" are unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Bynum, 70 N.Y.2d 858; People v. Ford, 62 N.Y.2d 275; see also, People v. Ahmed, 66 N.Y.2d 307; People v. Udzinski, 146 A.D.2d 245, 248-252). Under the circumstances of this case, we decline to address these issues in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. Bracken, J.P., Kooper, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. McKinnon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 31, 1990
168 A.D.2d 691 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. McKinnon

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DONALD McKINNON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 31, 1990

Citations

168 A.D.2d 691 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Citing Cases

People v. Wilson

The defendant's contention is, therefore, beyond the scope of appellate review as a matter of law (see, CPL…

People v. Lekhram

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is based…