From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. McIver

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 14, 1989
147 A.D.2d 592 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

February 14, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bonomo, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

While the defendant alleges that he was beaten by a police officer after his arrest thereby compelling him to make certain incriminating statements, his allegations were disputed by a detective who testified at the defendant's Huntley hearing, and there was no other evidence that a beating occurred. Based upon our review of the transcript of the Huntley hearing, we perceive no basis to overturn the hearing court's finding that the defendant fully understood his rights which had been administered to him on at least two occasions, and that the statements in question were freely and voluntarily made. The issues of credibility were primarily for the hearing court to determine and its findings should be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous (see, People v Armstead, 98 A.D.2d 726; People v Vail, 90 A.D.2d 917, 918).

We further find no merit to the defendant's contention that the prosecution failed to establish the crime of robbery in the first degree because it failed to produce evidence that the weapon he utilized was operative or loaded. Penal Law § 160.15 (4) merely requires the prosecution to prove that the defendant or another participant displayed what appeared to be a pistol, revolver or other firearm. Contrary to defendant's assertions, it was incumbent upon him to affirmatively prove that the weapon was inoperative or unloaded (see, People v Brown, 108 A.D.2d 922), which he failed to do.

In addition, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt (see, People v Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15).

We have considered the defendant's remaining contentions and find that they are either unpreserved for appellate review or are without merit. Thompson, J.P., Rubin, Spatt and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. McIver

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 14, 1989
147 A.D.2d 592 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

People v. McIver

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SHELTON McIVER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 14, 1989

Citations

147 A.D.2d 592 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
537 N.Y.S.2d 887

Citing Cases

People v. Villa

We find that the hearing court properly denied suppression of the evidence. The defendant's argument that in…

People v. McCallum

We reject the defendant's contention that the hearing court erred in denying that branch of his omnibus…