From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. McFadden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 6, 1994
205 A.D.2d 560 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

June 6, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.).


Ordered, that the sentence is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof directing the payment of the crime victim assistance fee.

Penal Law § 60.00 (2) provides that the "sole provision" of article 60 "that shall apply in the case of an offense committed by a juvenile offender is section 60.10 * * * and no other provisions of this article shall be deemed or construed to apply in any such case." Where statutory language is clear and unambiguous, a court is constrained to give effect to the plain meaning of the words used (see, People v. Floyd J., 61 N.Y.2d 895, 896). In this case the language of the statute clearly precludes the imposition of a crime victim assistance fee pursuant to Penal Law § 60.35 (1) where the defendant was sentenced as a juvenile offender. Mangano, P.J., Bracken, Lawrence, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. McFadden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 6, 1994
205 A.D.2d 560 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. McFadden

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ALEX McFADDEN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 6, 1994

Citations

205 A.D.2d 560 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
614 N.Y.S.2d 266

Citing Cases

People v. Stump

“Penal Law § 60.00(2) provides that the ‘sole provision’ of article 60 ‘that shall apply in the case of an…

PEOPLE v. HURD

In light of our determination, we do not reach the defendant's contention that the court should have inquired…