From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. McFadden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 24, 1986
118 A.D.2d 805 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

March 24, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Egitto, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

There was sufficient evidence before the hearing court to support the determination that the defendant's statements were spontaneous and not the product of police interrogation. Thus, the denial of the branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress his statement was not erroneous and must be sustained on appeal (see, People v. Johnson, 105 A.D.2d 805; see, People v. Gonzalez, 55 N.Y.2d 720, cert denied 456 U.S. 1010).

Defense counsel's failure to move to reopen the suppression hearing following trial testimony which indicated that the statement may have been made in response to police questioning (see, CPL 710.40) does not, under the circumstances of this case, demonstrate that the defendant received ineffective assistance of counsel (see, People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137).

We have examined the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be either unpreserved or without merit. Lazer, J.P., Bracken, Brown and Kooper, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. McFadden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 24, 1986
118 A.D.2d 805 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

People v. McFadden

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN McFADDEN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 24, 1986

Citations

118 A.D.2d 805 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

People v. Matthews

50; People v. Abdul-Hakim, 289 A.D.2d 587; People v. Bannister, 220 A.D.2d 520, 521; People v. DeJesus, 55…

People v. Lam

Here, the officer's testimony that he attempted to stop the defendant's vehicle after observing the defendant…