From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. McCowan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 4, 1996
226 A.D.2d 759 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

April 4, 1996

Appeal from the County Court of Rensselaer County (McGrath, J.).


After his conviction of the crime of burglary in the third degree, defendant was sentenced to five years' probation. He subsequently violated the terms of his probation by, inter alia, failing to participate in a drug and alcohol treatment program and using illegal substances. As a result, his probation was revoked and he was sentenced to a term of 2 1/3 to 7 years in prison. Defendant now argues that the sentence is harsh and excessive and that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel. Given the nature of the crime at issue and defendant's lengthy criminal history, we do not find that the sentence is harsh or excessive. Moreover, after reviewing the record, we find that he was provided meaningful representation. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, White, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. McCowan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 4, 1996
226 A.D.2d 759 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. McCowan

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANTONIO McCOWAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 4, 1996

Citations

226 A.D.2d 759 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
639 N.Y.S.2d 969

Citing Cases

People v. Mcneil

Moreover, in light of defendant's long history of alcohol-related offenses and prior probation violations,…

People v. Hunter

ce because it came within an exception to the hearsay rule ( see CPLR 4518 [a]; People v Maldonado, 44 AD3d…