From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. McCargo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 22, 1998
251 A.D.2d 600 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

June 22, 1998

Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Orenstein, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

There was no Brady violation ( see, Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83) in the instant case since the People did not possess the material in question ( see, People v. Johnson, 195 A.D.2d 481). The defendant's remaining contentions lack merit.

Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Krausman and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. McCargo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 22, 1998
251 A.D.2d 600 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. McCargo

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DONALD C. McCARGO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 22, 1998

Citations

251 A.D.2d 600 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
673 N.Y.S.2d 939

Citing Cases

People v. Santor

Contrary to defendant's contention, he was not entitled to any relief for the alleged failure to turn over…

People v. Hearns

To be deemed Brady material, the material must be exculpatory and within the possession, custody, or control…