Opinion
November 22, 1993
Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Harrington, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt of resisting arrest beyond a reasonable doubt, notwithstanding the defendant's acquittal of all other charges under the indictment (see, People v SiMartin, 135 A.D.2d 591; People v Maturevitz, 149 A.D.2d 908; cf., People v Saitta, 79 A.D.2d 994; see also, People v Peacock, 68 N.Y.2d 675; People v Collins, 178 A.D.2d 789; People v Williams, 25 N.Y.2d 86; People v Bertino, 93 A.D.2d 972).
The defendant's contention that the court improperly admitted testimony as to a statement she had uttered during the incident in question because she was not provided with written notice of the prosecution's intent to use such statement at trial is without merit (see, CPL 710.30 [a]; People v Greer, 42 N.Y.2d 170; People v Wells, 133 A.D.2d 385; see also, People v Kimbell, 169 A.D.2d 880; People v Stewart, 160 A.D.2d 966).
We have examined the defendant's remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Mangano, P.J., Thompson, Sullivan and Ritter, JJ., concur.