From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. May

Michigan Court of Appeals
May 26, 1971
34 Mich. App. 130 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)

Opinion

Docket No. 10412.

Decided May 26, 1971.

Appeal from Oakland, Farrell E. Roberts, J. Submitted Division 2 May 10, 1971, at Lansing. (Docket No. 10412.) Decided May 26, 1971.

David E. May was convicted of uttering and publishing a forged instrument. Defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, Thomas G. Plunkett, Prosecuting Attorney, and Frank R. Knox, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.

Curtis Rundell, for defendant on appeal.

Before: DANHOF, P.J., and FITZGERALD and QUINN, JJ.


Defendant seeks reversal of his jury conviction and sentence for uttering and publishing a forged instrument, MCLA § 750.249 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.446). He contends reversible error was committed because the prosecuting attorney was not required to indorse and produce an alleged res gestae witness. The record indicates that this witness was known to defendant prior to trial and defendant failed to move at trial for the indorsement of the witness. The question presented was not saved for review. People v. Love (1969), 18 Mich. App. 228, 231.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. May

Michigan Court of Appeals
May 26, 1971
34 Mich. App. 130 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)
Case details for

People v. May

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v. MAY

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: May 26, 1971

Citations

34 Mich. App. 130 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)
190 N.W.2d 739

Citing Cases

People v. Koehler

"(3) When the res gestae witness was a participant in the crime, People v Lyle Brown, 37 Mich. App. 25; 194…

People v. Histed

"(3) When the res gestae witness was a participant in the crime, People v Lyle Brown 37 Mich. App. 25; 194…