From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Matthews

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 5, 1960
11 A.D.2d 784 (N.Y. App. Div. 1960)

Opinion

July 5, 1960


Appeal by defendant: (1) from a judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, entered March 10, 1960, after trial, convicting him of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, and sentencing him to serve 60 days (execution of which was suspended), and to pay a fine of $100; and (2) from an order of said court, entered on the same date, denying his motion in arrest of judgment. The fine was paid. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, information dismissed, and fine remitted. Except for defendant's alleged admission, made while intoxicated, that he had been driving the motor vehicle, there is no proof in the record that he was the one who, while intoxicated, operated the vehicle. In the absence of additional proof the conviction may not stand (Code Crim. Pro., § 395; People v. Hemleb, 4 A.D.2d 878). Appeal from order in arrest of judgment dismissed. No such order is contained in the record. In any event, no separate appeal lies from such an order. Nolan, P.J., Beldock, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Matthews

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 5, 1960
11 A.D.2d 784 (N.Y. App. Div. 1960)
Case details for

People v. Matthews

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CLARENCE MATTHEWS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 5, 1960

Citations

11 A.D.2d 784 (N.Y. App. Div. 1960)

Citing Cases

People v. Schools

Defendant's principal argument on appeal is directed at the sufficiency of the People's proof that he drove…

Matter of Van Tassell v. N.Y. St. Commissioner

The nature of his involvement is not detailed. In People v. Matthews ( 11 A.D.2d 784) and People v. Hemleb (…