From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Mateo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 30, 1997
239 A.D.2d 965 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

May 30, 1997

Present — Green, J.P., Lawton, Callahan, Doerr and Fallon, JJ.


Motion for change of venue denied. Memorandum: We conclude that defendant has not on this application met his burden of demonstrating that there is "reasonable cause to believe that a fair and impartial trial cannot be had" in Monroe County (CPL 230.20). If it develops during the voir dire that a fair and impartial jury cannot be drawn, an appropriate application may then be made. The relief requested in the application before us now is premature ( see, People v. Scott, 197 A.D.2d 936; see generally, People v. DiPiazza, 24 N.Y.2d 342).


Summaries of

People v. Mateo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 30, 1997
239 A.D.2d 965 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Mateo

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v. ANGEL MATEO, Defendant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 30, 1997

Citations

239 A.D.2d 965 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
662 N.Y.S.2d 279

Citing Cases

People v. Cahill

Mr. Cahill was denied his right to a fair trial before an impartial jury because inflammatory and prejudicial…

People v. Zimmer

It is hereby ORDERED that the motion is denied. Memorandum: We conclude that defendant has not met his burden…