From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Martin

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 22, 2011
89 A.D.3d 1039 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

2011-11-22

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. William MARTIN, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Ellen Fried of counsel), for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Thomas M. Ross, and Terrence F. Heller of counsel), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Ellen Fried of counsel), for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Thomas M. Ross, and Terrence F. Heller of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Sullivan, J.), dated July 30, 2010, which denied his motion to be resentenced pursuant to CPL 440.46 on his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third *558 degree (two counts), which sentence was originally imposed, upon a jury verdict, on November 6, 1995.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 440.46.

The Supreme Court denied the defendant's motion for resentencing solely upon the ground that his status as a reincarcerated parole violator made him ineligible for relief under the 2009 Drug Law Reform Act, which is codified by CPL 440.46. However, “prisoners who have been paroled, and then reincarcerated for violating their parole, are not for that reason barred from seeking relief under the statute” ( People v. Paulin, 17 N.Y.3d 238, 242, 929 N.Y.S.2d 36, 952 N.E.2d 1028; see People v. Vidal, 87 A.D.3d 1085, 929 N.Y.S.2d 752; People v. Santiago, 87 A.D.3d 1077, 929 N.Y.S.2d 761; People v. Howard, 85 A.D.3d 1202, 1202–1203, 926 N.Y.S.2d 296; People v. Phillips, 82 A.D.3d 1011, 1012, 919 N.Y.S.2d 88). Accordingly, as the People correctly concede, the order appealed from must be reversed, and the matter remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 440.46.

RIVERA, J.P., DICKERSON, ENG and ROMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Martin

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 22, 2011
89 A.D.3d 1039 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

People v. Martin

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. William MARTIN, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 22, 2011

Citations

89 A.D.3d 1039 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 8614
933 N.Y.S.2d 557

Citing Cases

People v. Lankford

The Court finds no case law supporting Defendant's view that he is eligible for resentencing under the DLRA…

People v. Ashby

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings…