From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Martin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 5, 1997
239 A.D.2d 436 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

May 5, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Pitaro, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

There is no merit to the defendant's contention that his plea of guilty should be vacated because the factual allocution was insufficient. Where, as here, the defendant pleads guilty to a lesser crime than the one charged in the indictment, a factual basis for the plea is unnecessary provided the allocution establishes that the defendant understood the charges against him (see, People v. Moore, 71 N.Y.2d 1002; People v. Pelchat, 62 N.Y.2d 97; People v. Clairborne, 29 N.Y.2d 950). Here the record indicates that the defendant understood the charges against him and that he entered his plea knowingly and voluntarily.

Mangano, P.J., Ritter, Sullivan, Altman and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Martin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 5, 1997
239 A.D.2d 436 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Martin

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. AUDIE MARTIN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 5, 1997

Citations

239 A.D.2d 436 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
658 N.Y.S.2d 341

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

The defendant's challenge to the factual sufficiency of his plea allocution is unpreserved for appellate…

People v. Mayo

der, a "nonexistent" ( People v Martinez, 81 NY2d 810, 811) or "logically and legally impossible" ( People v…