From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Marrero

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 11, 1999
259 A.D.2d 836 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

March 11, 1999

Appeal from the County Court of Sullivan County (Ledina, J.).


On April 10, 1996 and May 1, 1996, defendant was charged in three separate indictments with a total of four counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree and three counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree. Thereafter, on May 28, 1996, defendant was arraigned and counsel was assigned to represent him. Defense counsel filed two motions and eventually, on June 4, 1996, the People filed their notice of readiness for trial. On July 8, 1997, defendant entered pleas of guilty to three counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree in full satisfaction of the remaining counts. As a result, County Court sentenced defendant as a second felony offender to concurrent indeterminate terms of imprisonment of six years to life. Defendant now appeals contending that his constitutional right to a speedy trial ( see, CPL 30.20) was violated.

We begin by acknowledging that the constitutional right to a speedy trial may, indeed, be surrendered ( see, People v. Rodriguez, 50 N.Y.2d 553, 557). Since, as defendant readily concedes, prior to the entry of his guilty pleas he made no motion to dismiss the indictments on the ground of denial of the right to a speedy trial, defendant has waived this claim ( see, People v. Lawrence, 64 N.Y.2d 200, 203-204; People v. Jordan, 62 N.Y.2d 825, 826; People v. Gates, 238 A.D.2d 729, 731, lv denied 90 N.Y.2d 905; see also, CPL 210.20 [g]; [2]; 210.45 [1]). In any event, mere delay, which is in essence all that the record in this case reflects, is insufficient by itself to constitute a meritorious claim for violation of the right to a speedy trial ( see, People v. Taranovich, 37 N.Y.2d 442, 444-447; People v. Kindlon, 217 A.D.2d 793, 794, lv denied 86 N.Y.2d 844).

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Yesawich Jr. and Carpinello, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Marrero

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 11, 1999
259 A.D.2d 836 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Marrero

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MANUEL MARRERO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 11, 1999

Citations

259 A.D.2d 836 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
686 N.Y.S.2d 524

Citing Cases

People v. Rogers

In evaluating an alleged CPL 30.20 statutory speedy trial violation or a violation of the constitutional due…

People v. Kim

Mere delays in bringing a case to trial are insufficient to support a motion to dismiss based on…