Opinion
2013-06-5
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Conrad MARHONE, appellant.
Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Casey Rose Scott of counsel), for appellant. Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano and Anastasia Spanakos of counsel), for respondent.
Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Casey Rose Scott of counsel), for appellant. Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano and Anastasia Spanakos of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buchter, J.), imposed June 19, 2012, which, upon his conviction of murder in the second degree, robbery in the first degree (two counts), robbery in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, imposed a period of postrelease supervision on the convictions of robbery in the first degree (two counts) and robbery in the second degree, in addition to the determinate term of imprisonment previously imposed by the same court on April 22, 2002.
ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, his resentencing to a term which included the statutorily required period of postrelease supervision did not subject him to double jeopardy or violate his right to due process of law, since, at the time he was resentenced, he had not yet completed the sentence of imprisonment originally imposed upon him ( see People v. Lingle, 16 N.Y.3d 621, 630, 926 N.Y.S.2d 4, 949 N.E.2d 952; People v. Dolberry, 95 A.D.3d 1357, 944 N.Y.S.2d 924;People v. Dawkins, 87 A.D.3d 550, 927 N.Y.S.2d 797).