From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Manzione

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 4, 1985
109 A.D.2d 755 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

March 4, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J., Pitaro, J.).


Judgment reversed, on the law, and matter remitted to Criminal Term for a de novo suppression hearing before another justice.

The prosecution must turn over to a criminal defendant prior statements of the prosecutor's witnesses ( People v. Rosario, 9 N.Y.2d 286, cert denied 368 U.S. 866). At the instant suppression hearing, defendant did not receive (1) Police Officer Alyota's notes of the description of the perpetrators given by complainant Thomas Lass, (2) Police Officer Scott's notes from a radio call description received prior to his apprehending defendant, and (3) Assistant District Attorney Fallen's notes of his interview with Lass. The prosecution did not meet its burden of showing a good-faith effort to follow proper procedures to preserve the evidence or to produce such evidence at the hearing ( see, People v. Perez, 50 A.D.2d 908; People v. Day, 102 Misc.2d 11). These circumstances require a de novo suppression hearing before a different justice.

We have considered defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Titone, J.P., Thompson, O'Connor and Rubin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Manzione

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 4, 1985
109 A.D.2d 755 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. Manzione

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LOUIS MANZIONE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 4, 1985

Citations

109 A.D.2d 755 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

People v. Archer

44 (1) requires the People to produce at a pretrial hearing "[a]ny written or recorded statement, including…