From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Manitaras

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 13, 1976
55 A.D.2d 629 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

December 13, 1976


Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered October 23, 1975, convicting him of bail jumping in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. This case is remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). Defendant's contention that he should have been permitted to answer questions concerning his state of mind when he left the jurisdiction while on trial, is without merit. Defendant's intent is immaterial as to the crime of bail jumping and as to its affirmative defense (see Penal Law, § 215.57, 215.59 Penal; People v Harris, 54 A.D.2d 739). We have considered defendant's other contentions and find them to be without merit. Martuscello, Acting P.J., Latham, Hawkins and O'Connor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Manitaras

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 13, 1976
55 A.D.2d 629 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

People v. Manitaras

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANASTASIOS MANITARAS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 13, 1976

Citations

55 A.D.2d 629 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

People v. Wise

The Patterson rationale, directly applicable here, has supported the constitutionality of the analogous…

People v. White

We disagree. The authorities hold that the crime of bail jumping does not require proof of any culpable…