From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Manino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 30, 2003
306 A.D.2d 542 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2000-06699

Argued June 10, 2003.

June 30, 2003.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kohm, J.), rendered June 29, 2000, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, burglary in the first degree, unlawful imprisonment in the second degree, and endangering the welfare of a child, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Jay L. Weiner of counsel), for appellant, and appellant pro se.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, Roni C. Piplani, and Donna Aldea of counsel), for respondent.

Before: A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, NANCY E. SMITH, THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court properly admitted evidence of other crimes on the issue of identity. There was clear and convincing evidence of both a unique modus operandi and of the defendant's identity as the perpetrator of the other crimes. Further, the probative value of the evidence outweighed the potential prejudice to the defendant ( see People v. Cornish, 280 A.D.2d 552).

The defendant's remaining contentions, raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are without merit.

PRUDENTI, P.J., ALTMAN, SMITH and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Manino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 30, 2003
306 A.D.2d 542 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Manino

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. ROBERT MANINO, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 30, 2003

Citations

306 A.D.2d 542 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
761 N.Y.S.2d 850

Citing Cases

People v. Saunders

The Supreme Court correctly permitted the introduction of testimony by the victim of a robbery committed…

People v. Philips

In any event, all of the defendant's contentions on appeal regarding the suppression hearing are without…