From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Mangine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 14, 1979
73 A.D.2d 816 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Opinion

December 14, 1979

Appeal from the Erie County Court.

Present — Cardamone, J.P., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Callahan and Moule, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The prosecutor improperly made himself an unsworn witness when he endeavored to impeach defendant's alibi witness by asking him on cross-examination about prior inconsistent statements that the witness made to the prosecutor in a telephone conversation (see People v. Lovello, 1 N.Y.2d 436; People v. Wasserman, 46 A.D.2d 915, 917; see, generally, People v. Arabadjis, 93 Misc.2d 826). However, this error under the circumstances here was harmless (People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230). Defendant's claim that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel for his attorney's failure to make necessary pretrial motions, including motions for Brady and Rosario material, is without merit. Defendant further claims that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel because his attorney failed to move to dismiss the indictment for failure to grant a speedy trial and proceeded to trial in the absence of a crucial witness. Insufficient facts appear in this record to permit adequate review of these allegations, and these claims may be pursued, if the defendant is so advised, by moving pursuant to CPL 440.10. We have examined other contentions raised by defendant and find them to be without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Mangine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 14, 1979
73 A.D.2d 816 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)
Case details for

People v. Mangine

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GARY MANGINE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 14, 1979

Citations

73 A.D.2d 816 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Citing Cases

State v. Sierra

The right to ask leading questions does not license the examiner to testify, in effect, by making statements…

People v. Paperno

We wish, however, to make clear that we do not attribute any improper motives to the District Attorney or any…