From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Mancini

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 5, 1997
239 A.D.2d 436 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

May 5, 1997

Appeal from the County Court, Dutchess County (Dolan, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

In sentencing the defendant, the County Court properly considered the defendant's statement made to a State Investigator even though the statement had been suppressed as evidence obtained in violation of Miranda v. Arizona ( 384 U.S. 436; see, People v. Williams, 164 A.D.2d 1, 6, mod 79 N.Y.2d 281, 288; People v. Estenson, 101 A.D.2d 687; People v. Wright, 104 Misc.2d 911, 920-926).

Bracken, J. P., O'Brien, Santucci, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Mancini

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 5, 1997
239 A.D.2d 436 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Mancini

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KEITH L.C. MANCINI…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 5, 1997

Citations

239 A.D.2d 436 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
658 N.Y.S.2d 37

Citing Cases

People v. Zowbvki

Evidence that has previously been suppressed may properly be considered in sentencing a defendant. ( People…

State v. Person

Nichols, 438 F.3d at 443 (citations omitted). Accord, Del Vecchio v. Illinois Dep't of Corr., 31 F.3d 1363…