From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lynah

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 25, 2008
56 A.D.3d 375 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 4656.

November 25, 2008.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Gregory Cairo, J.), rendered November 29, 2006, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony drug offender, to a term of two years, unanimously affirmed.

Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Karen M. Kalikow of counsel), for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Amir Vonsover of counsel), for respondent.

Lippman, P.J., Gonzalez, Moskowitz, Acosta and Renwick, JJ.


The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. There is no basis for disturbing the court's credibility determinations, which are supported by the record ( see People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759, 761). At a particularly drug-prone location, an officer recognized defendant from a recent investigation into a possible drug transaction. Defendant was holding a plastic bag and counting something. When defendant saw the officer, he pushed the bag up his sleeve, and when the officer approached, defendant secreted the bag in his pants, apparently placing it in his buttocks. This unusual and furtive behavior was highly suspicious ( see generally People v Jones, 90 NY2d 835), particularly since defendant's behavior on the prior occasion had similarities to this incident, and the police accordingly had reasonable suspicion justifying a forcible stop and detention. When defendant told the officer that he had drugs in his buttocks, this provided probable cause for his arrest ( see People v Hall, 10 NY3d 303, cert denied 555 US ", 129 S Ct 159).

Defendant did not preserve his claim that the evidence failed to establish a valid consent to the removal by police of drugs from his buttocks area, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we also reject it on the merits.


Summaries of

People v. Lynah

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 25, 2008
56 A.D.3d 375 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

People v. Lynah

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DERRICK LYNAH…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 25, 2008

Citations

56 A.D.3d 375 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 9268
868 N.Y.S.2d 184

Citing Cases

People v. Thomas

This logic is even more compelling as to defendant, who was not even known to have a criminal past, and was…

People v. Tapia

In determining whether probable cause exists in a drug sale case, courts must consider factors such as:…